• Home
  • Our People
    • Christine Burns
    • David T. Barton
    • Benjamin J. Naylor
    • Kathryn Hackett King
    • Alison Pulaski Carter
    • Katya M. Lancero
    • Michael B. Guilliam
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Litigation
    • Employment Law Advice
    • Restrictive Covenants
    • Employment Contracts
    • Compliance
  • BurnsBarton Blog
  • Get Started
  • Contact and Directions

SCOTUS Imposes Steeper “But For” Standard on § 1981 Claimants

April 08, 2020
by Ben Naylor
0 Comment

In a recent decision (Comcast Corp. v. Nat’l Ass’n of African Am.-Owned Media, No. 18-1171, 2020 WL 1325816, at *1 (U.S. Mar. 23, 2020)), the Supreme Court held that an employee who allege claims race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 have the burden of proving their race was the “but for” cause of their injury. The High Court further added that § 1981 plaintiffs maintain this elevated burden throughout the entire lawsuit (at the pleading stage and at trial). This overturned the Ninth Circuit’s holding that an employee only needs to prove discrimination played “some role” in the decision-making process. The Comcast decision is also important because it makes it harder for employees to access the unlimited damages that are available for race discrimination under § 1981. (By contrast, Title VII caps the damages employees may recover, and only requires proof that race was a “motivating factor” in the decision to impose adverse action).

With its decision in Comcast, the Supreme Court has now held that employees must prove “but for” causation if they bring claims for age discrimination, Title VII retaliation and now § 1981 race discrimination. These decisions strengthen employers’ ability to defend themselves or compel favorable settlements in such cases.

About the Author
Benjamin Naylor is a partner practicing in the areas of employment law and litigation. Ben represents exceptional employers in Arizona and nationally. Ben has significant litigation and trial experience, but enjoys counseling employers and assisting with all varieties of personnel issues in order to keep his clients out of the courtroom.
Social Share
  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

Contact BurnsBarton Attorneys

Please call or email any of our attorneys. We’ll talk with you about your needs and design a plan to accomplish your goals. Initial consultations are generally free and we offer flat-fee and alternative billing options for interested clients. Our rates are lower than the large firms we left, but it is our billing policies and practices that make us the most cost-efficient solution for employers in the Southwest.  
 
    Call 602-753-4500

About BurnsBarton PLC

BurnsBarton is a woman-owned business made up of big firm attorneys who have gone small to provide better client service at a lower cost. Our team has the horsepower necessary to handle big cases, while remaining committed to excellent client service. We focus on what we do best: advising and defending employers efficiently, effectively, and successfully. In short, we have “Big Law” experience, with better, more economical service.

Mission Statement

We protect good employers from all types of employment claims. We win cases, and we do so in the most cost-efficient manner possible. We work with the best people on the planet.  

certified-womens-business-enterprise-logo-small

Disclaimer

The information on this web site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should contact an attorney for advice on your individual situation. Contacting BurnsBarton PLC does not create an attorney-client relationship.

 

Address: 2201 E. Camelback Road Suite 360 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Phone: 602-753-4500
© 2012 - 2020 BurnsBarton PLC